Define Puritanism and Democracy and show how they were a mixed legacy.

From Inequality to Equality In Puritanism and Democracy: A complicated Legacy, Stephen Foster shows how, condescension their assumptions of inequality, the government established in mammy by the Puritans, evolved into nearlything that was neer intended; a government base on democracy. To be a Puritan was to be a member of but the most important body of mass since the Apostles (pg 23). Puritans felt it was their job, their augur duty, to establish a pure lodge based on Gods word. They would be as a Citty upon a Hill, the eies of all people are upon them (pg 24). Meaning they conceptualized they would be this pure, divine society that the difference of the world would nonice and strive to emulate. They loved their set ab issue England real much and were hoping to purge from her Catholicism, and their acceptability for things not of God. after they created a successful godly society, they believed they would be able to go spinal column to England and re-create it there. Puritans were somewhat intolerant and seemed to believe that if somebody did not believe as they did, then that mortals assurance did not matter. When someone did try to voice an opinion that was antithetic from theirs, then that person was considered a heretic and was forced out of town.

The Puritans did re-create some of the English ways and techniques as they aphorism necessary, but they did not re-create all of them. The Puritans believed heavily in building a society based on biblical principle derived from the al-Quran as interpreted by the choose few. Puritan well-disposed values called not just for healthy bookkeeping, but for subor! dination, inequality, authority, unity, stifling of the individual will for the good of the unanimous (pg 25). Basically, this amounted to the society agreeing that what they were... If you pauperization to get a full essay, invest it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper