The homo- / heterosexual distinction is an inherently anxious and unstable structure of knowledge." Discuss this proposal with reference to the notion of the closet.

The sapphic and hetero knowledgeable distinction is indeed an unstable twist of knowledge. This instability and anxiousness of this reciprocal interpretation is inherent callable to the very nature of sexuality--its invisibility and tendency towards secrecy in the form of the pressing. Heterosexuality and queerity is inevitably intertwined with each other. wizardry can non exist without the other. Heterosexuality is dependent on homosexuality, as the marginalized other, in order to establish itself as the norm. Without homosexuality, there would be no affect for the term heterosexuality, as it would be a default, so much of a norm that it need not be mentioned. As Katz aptly put, the paradox of the norm is that it is everyplace yet nowhere. As we continue to grapple with the inconsistence of this binary star explanation of homo/ heterosexuality, we realize that it is perhaps too limiting a view of human sexuality that does not accurately confer reality. The very exi stence of the closet renders the rigid binary definition of homosexuality versus heterosexuality inherently problematic. The closet is a metaphorical space that homosexuals abide in, deliberately concealing their sexual preference. The closet is essentially an oppressive private sphere and is considered the delimitate complex body part of homosexual oppression in the 19th century. (Sedgwick 1990: 71) It has proceed an integral part in the understanding homosexuality. The closet is a special kind of epistemology for a specific kind of oppression. (Sedgwick 1990: 71) The closeted much experience stress and depression, they perpetually monitor their behavior, gesture, language, speech, hobbies and interests to ensure that they advance normal, that is heterosexual. That creates a consciousness of invisibility in the homosexual community. Unlike other minority groups like Asians in a western country, the majority homosexual are not visibly distinguishable from the majority peop le (Paul 1982: 355) As discussed by Sedgwick! , in the... If you unavoidableness to get a extensive essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper