Bioethics Paper: Prenatal Genetic Screening Essay

antenatal Genetic Testing has become atomic number 53 of the most prominent and influential advances in clinical genetics today. every(prenominal) year, hundreds of couples request check services, hence, subjecting themselves to the results of the diagnosis. For some, the information may be a suspiration of relief, and for others a whisper of warning. The concept of prenatal Genetic Screening has notwithstanding recently surfaced for controversy. In consequence to the completion of the Human Genome Project (2003), the choice for Prenatal Genetic Screening can now be performed for an low-cost 1,000 dollars. Utilizing state of the art multiplex technologies such as gene chips and small beads, we can already track hundreds of thousands of unique SNPs or Single base Polymorphisms to screen our genome at over half a million pinpoints that ar commitd to be associated with particular traits, diseases, susceptibilities, and conditions.In addition to screening for diseases, this te chnology threatens to potter with our perception of individuality. Raising the question of constitutionality, and whether it should be permitted to terminate a maternity based for reasons of sex, hair color, or eye color graphic designer Babies. If approved by the FDA, this option is predicted to prompt a dramatic increase in maternalism terminations and lead to a host of practical and legal questions. Some believe that the concept is simple. Utilizing potential knowledge of the impending future, we are given the misadventure to think and to prepare. We are given the outlook to absorb the entirety of the plaza and consult a genetics counselor. With prior knowledge we could save flock years of suffering and financial trouble.Others question the effectiveness and benefits of genetic screening and wonder if the process would prompt undue emotional distress, distress for the asylum of the fetus and also the issue of privacy. And continue to note the dark and looming connotation s of Designer Babies. It is evident that the latter argument is the common preference, however, I will need the road less taken. Five years ago I hold waterd an sinless childhood, where everyone laughed and played, and there was no worse suffering beyond scraping my human knee on the pavement. Two years later that reality was shattered. What I didnt know at the time was that there were children who lived lives far different from mine.Children like my baby cousin Jasmine. Jasmine was born with a rare genetic illness called Pfeiffers Syndrome, a disease characterized by the early fusion of the finger cymbals in her skull. She would never live my childhood reality, for frankly she would never live to the age. Often times I wondered what could have been done, and only recently has it revealed itself to me that Prenatal Genetic Screening was the answer to my persistent question. If only it had been available at the time, maybe Jasmine could have grown up to be the next mob D. Wats on, Francis Crick or Rosalind Franklin. Now we will never know. Now that it is likely to save, to relieve, and to cure, is it worth the risk to give children like Jasmine a fair chance at life? I believe so.Works CitedThe chairs Council on Bioethics The Future of Newborn Screening Clouds on the visible horizon? The Presidents Council on Bioethics The Future of Newborn Screening Clouds on the Horizon? N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013.The Genetic Testing Controversy. The Genetic Testing Controversy. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013. score and Overview of Newborn Screening. Welcome. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013.New Prenatal Genetic Test Is frequently More Powerful at Detecting Fetal Abnormalities. ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 09 Feb. 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.Prenatal Diagnostic Tests and the Social, Legal, and Ethical Implications. Prenatal Diagnostic Tests and the Social, Legal, and Ethical Implications. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.