Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Buck versus Bell Essay example -- Supreme Court Sterilization Essays

Buck versus Bell During the early twentieth century, the United States was enduring operative social and economic changes due to its transformation into a commercial and industrial world power. As the need for labor escalated within many an(prenominal) urban areas, millions of Europeans emigrated from Southern and Eastern Europe with the hopes of capitalizing upon these employment opportunities and attaining a better life. Simultaneously, many African-Americans migrated from the rural South into major cities, bearing the same intentions as those of the European immigrants. The presence of these minority groups divisorrated both racial and class fears within dust coat middle and upper class Americans. The fervent ethnocentrism resulting from these fears, coupled with the Social Darwinist concepts of Herbert Spencer, would in the long run spur the American eugenics movement. Originating from the theories of Sir Francis Galton, the cousin of Charles Darwin, eugenics is the study of human heredity and contractable principles for the purposes of improving the human race by limiting the proliferation of defective gene pools. Charles Davenport, the founding father of the American eugenics movement, was wiz of many elite Americans advocating for the internalization of the ideals of this new science into society. The work of Davenport, which became known as eugenic principles, would non only have an impact on public education, but a legal impact as well. By 1931, thirty state legislatures had passed automatic sterilization laws that targeted defective strains within the general population, such as the blind, the deaf, the poor, and the feebleminded. Virginia, one of these states, held the position that involuntary sterilization would not only benefit the overal... ... volume With Mental Disabilities Issues, Perspectives, and Cases (Westport CT Auburn House, 1995) 22.Works CitedBuck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200, 205. No. 292 US Supreme Ct. 1927.Brantlinger, Ellen . Sterilization of People With Mental Disabilities Issues, Perspectives, and Cases. Westport CT Auburn House, 1995.Larson, Edward. Sex, Race, and knowledge Eugenics in the Deep South. Baltimore The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Macklin, Ruth. Mental Retardation and Sterilization A hassle of Competency and Paternalism. New York Plenum Press, 1981.Reilly, Phillip. The Surgical Solution A History of willing Sterilization in the United States. Baltimore The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.Shapiro, Thomas. Population Control Politics Women, Sterilization, and productive Choice. Philadelphia Temple University Press, 1985.

No comments:

Post a Comment