Gun Control Essay -- Gun Control, 2015

Firearms are dangerous weapons used to intentionally and unintentionally consume people, which lead to one of Americas most heated debates gaseous state simplicity. With increasing crime and violence, m whatsoever a(prenominal) people look to taw control laws as a way to slow these trends down. On the other hand, others reckon that owning a gun is a constitutional right that should never be taken away. James Q. Wilsons essay Just deliberate onward Their Guns is an attempt to offer a solution to both sides of this argument. He claims that felonious possession of firearms is the problem and that skylark suspicious characters would be a undecomposed solution to the debate of gun control. However, ergodic frisking to end outlaw(prenominal) gun possession is a violation of privacy and an overbearing depute that would be impossible to take on.First of all, Wilson states that legal restraints on the observant purchase of guns ordain let little effect on the misappropriated use of guns (106). However, Wilson fails to neglect that lawbreakers have to get their guns from somewhere. Of course some criminals will steal their firearms, alone others look to breaking a different law. purchasing guns from an unlicensed dealer gives criminals a feeling of safety. The criminal does non have to worry about being caught with breaking and entering and can besides feel safe knowing that there is not a charge containing records that says he owns a gun. Federal law limits who can purchase a gun on the basis of age, criminal status, and mental health (Zimring 37), but it does not put a limit on the amount of firearms a person can purchase. Enabling people to buy as many guns as they would like supports the black market. Without any restrictions on gun laws a criminal can buy firearms freely from whoever wants to sell one to him. Forgetting these facts weakens Wilsons stance that gun control will not be able to help solve the issue of illegal gun possession.A gr own setback with Wilsons plan is the potential for racial profiling. He unconstipated recognizes this and says that young black and Hispanic men will probably be stopped more often than older white Anlgo males or women of any race (109). Some say that, to cut down on gun violence, it is necessary to target groups, neighborhoods, and races that are more likely to commit these crimes only it is demeaning and backwards. A good example of how the stop-and-frisk can lead to racial profiling is a case filed... ... but to go about it in the way Wilson suggests will only hurt the nation. Instilling a random frisk would set out more problems than it would solve. First and most important, Americans privacy would be at risk. Another point to look at is the large fortuity of racial profiling. To come so far in the area of elegant rights and adopt Wilsons plan would be taking a quantity backward. Also, it would be a travesty for the police to waste their time frisking possible suspects w hen there is already so much crime for them to be putting a stop to. Wilson fails to realize the problems his plan will cause America. Forgoing the end of illegal gun possession as Wilson proposes is not worth it when one looks at the harms it will create. Works CitedBoyd, Herb. Cops Must Pay. young York New Amsterdam News. 25 September 2003. 1.Wilson, James Q. Just Take Away Their Guns. The New York Times Magazine March 24, 1994. Rpt in up-to-date Issues and Enduring Questions 7th ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston Bedford/St. Martins . 2005. 106-109.Zimring, Franklin E. Firearms, Violence, and the Potential touch on of Firearms Control. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 32.1(2004) 34-37.